» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Quick Moderation |
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Ads |
|
|
 |
|

12-10-2009, 02:14 PM
|
 |
I am an RTB Addict !
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,660
Level up: 44%, 283 Points needed |
Thanks: 353
Thanked 411 Times in 330 Posts
|
|
|
Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
PR: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
December 10, 2009 Wilmington, NC- Driven by powerful special interests and much media sensation S. 373 aka ‘The Python Ban’ is likely to move forward despite lack of scientific justification. Pushed by Sponsor Senator Bill Nelson and the Humane Society of the United States S. 373 could devastate the trade in high quality captive bred reptiles in the United States.
Today the Senate Committee on the Environment & Public Works (EPW) will hold a business meeting on S. 373. The Committee Chair is Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and the Ranking Member is Senator James Inhofe (R-OK). The committee will hold a mark up session where they will consider S. 373, to amend title 18, United States Code, to add constrictor snakes of the species Python genera to the Injurious Wildlife list of the Lacey Act. The committee is expected to amend the bill to include the 9 snakes listed on a recent controversial report by the US Geological Survey (USGS). All tolled the bill could stop the import, export and interstate transport of as many as 45 species of Boas and Pythons.
The USGS report being used to justify these extreme measures has been called into question by a group of independent scientists in a letter to the EPW Committee on November 24, 2009. The letter characterized the USGS report as “not a bona-fide scientific paper”. The US Department of the Interior (DOI) and the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) stand by the report and have recommended to the committee that all 9 snakes reviewed should be included by amendment to S. 373. The independent scientists, who include professors from University of Florida, Arizona State University, Texas A&M and The National Geographic Society, go further to state, “this document is not suitable as the basis for legislative or regulatory policies, as its content is not based on best science practices”
The United States Association of Reptile Keepers (USARK) made an agreement in principle with Senator Bill Nelson’s office to limit the damage to a 3 billion dollar a year trade in these reptiles, but was informed yesterday that the agreement would not be honored. Senator Nelson has justified his position based on the recommendations made in regards to the USGS report by USFWS and DOI. Andrew Wyatt, president of USARK, commented that “it is a real shame that Senator Nelson has changed his position on this issue”. If the bill passes approximately 4 million boas and pythons already in captivity would be rendered valueless overnight with no provisions for disposition or compensation. Wyatt added, “it could create a situation where millions of people will be in possession of injurious wildlife. It is ludicrous to put so many law abiding citizens in that position and diminish the Lacey Act for the sake of political expediency.”
Passage of S. 373 would result in the loss of thousands of American jobs bankrupting an entire industry. Without strong evidence to support the injurious wildlife listing, USARK calls on the Senate EPW Committee to give an unfavorable rating to S. 373.
Contact:
Andrew Wyatt
president@usark.org
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jenny06 For This Useful Post:
|
|

12-10-2009, 02:38 PM
|
 |
The Xtreme

|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 605
Level up: 68%, 163 Points needed |
Thanks: 6
Thanked 366 Times in 160 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Welcome to the change. Voters remorse huh?
__________________
Joe Switalski
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FLVenom For This Useful Post:
|
|

12-10-2009, 03:59 PM
|
 |
Dorkus majorkus.

|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,388
Level up: 56%, 264 Points needed |
Thanks: 625
Thanked 1,119 Times in 665 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
USARK is now Tweeting live from the mark up meeting. Twitter.com/usark
__________________
|

12-10-2009, 04:07 PM
|
 |
Has Jungle Carpet Fever
  
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germantown, Tn.
Posts: 2,120
Points: 10,200, Level: 30 |
Level up: 42%, 350 Points needed |
Thanks: 583
Thanked 423 Times in 294 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
It has NOT moved forward yet. I don't know why it was emailed that way last night.
|

12-10-2009, 04:10 PM
|
 |
Regular RTB User
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 480
Level up: 35%, 195 Points needed |
Thanks: 123
Thanked 94 Times in 85 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
It has been amended to include the other 9 constrictors now.
|

12-10-2009, 04:10 PM
|
 |
Snakes need love too!
  
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,299
Points: 51,801, Level: 70 |
Level up: 47%, 749 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,870
Thanked 2,392 Times in 1,712 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Warning: thread may induce nausea.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mpgt For This Useful Post:
|
|

12-10-2009, 04:11 PM
|
 |
I'M HERE FOR TEH LULZ.
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Possum Kingdom
Posts: 4,343
Points: 10,737, Level: 31 |
Level up: 27%, 513 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,797
Thanked 1,698 Times in 992 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Yeah, I do feel quite sick.
__________________
Kung Pao Constrictors
"
You mean The Onion is not a legitimate news outlet?"
Allergenic
|

12-10-2009, 04:11 PM
|
 |
Dorkus majorkus.

|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,388
Level up: 56%, 264 Points needed |
Thanks: 625
Thanked 1,119 Times in 665 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Latest tweet from USARK; USARK S373 amended to include 9 constrictor snakes Amendment passed. S373 passes out of committee Inhofe votes no. Wants to address on floor .. Inhofe votes no. Wants to address on floor ... 8 minutes ago
__________________
|

12-10-2009, 04:12 PM
|
 |
I'M HERE FOR TEH LULZ.
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Possum Kingdom
Posts: 4,343
Points: 10,737, Level: 31 |
Level up: 27%, 513 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,797
Thanked 1,698 Times in 992 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
I have to get back to work, but I'll try and keep an eye on this today. :C
__________________
Kung Pao Constrictors
"
You mean The Onion is not a legitimate news outlet?"
Allergenic
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RayRay For This Useful Post:
|
|

12-10-2009, 04:17 PM
|
 |
Dorkus majorkus.

|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,388
Level up: 56%, 264 Points needed |
Thanks: 625
Thanked 1,119 Times in 665 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Please excuse my sloppy copy/paste job apparently I can't edit from my phone. Stupid touchscreen.
__________________
|

12-10-2009, 04:18 PM
|
 |
Snakes need love too!
  
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,299
Points: 51,801, Level: 70 |
Level up: 47%, 749 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,870
Thanked 2,392 Times in 1,712 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLVenom
Welcome to the change. Voters remorse huh?
|
We have a lot of self serving "representatives" who don't know or care what's right or wrong. I don't know what's motivating the HSUS.
|

12-10-2009, 04:24 PM
|
 |
RTB Aficionado

|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 588
Level up: 63%, 188 Points needed |
Thanks: 146
Thanked 257 Times in 133 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
http://twitter.com/nationalpet today will be a dark day for anyone that keep's large snake's in the u.s
__________________
The way to love anything is to realize that it may be lost
Last edited by strikerratt; 12-10-2009 at 04:29 PM.
|

12-10-2009, 04:25 PM
|
 |
I'M HERE FOR TEH LULZ.
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Possum Kingdom
Posts: 4,343
Points: 10,737, Level: 31 |
Level up: 27%, 513 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,797
Thanked 1,698 Times in 992 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpgt
We have a lot of self serving "representatives" who don't know or care what's right or wrong. I don't know what's motivating the HSUS.
|
I do....
__________________
Kung Pao Constrictors
"
You mean The Onion is not a legitimate news outlet?"
Allergenic
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RayRay For This Useful Post:
|
|

12-10-2009, 04:31 PM
|
|
Regular RTB User
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Communist state of British Columbia
Posts: 97
Level up: 90%, 20 Points needed |
Thanks: 4
Thanked 76 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Love the comment in the commitee about helping us by letting us keep the skins as a cushion of the economic impact . Like we raise these animals only for the skin trade.
|

12-10-2009, 04:36 PM
|
 |
I am an RTB Addict !
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,660
Level up: 44%, 283 Points needed |
Thanks: 353
Thanked 411 Times in 330 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Senator Cardin agreed that time should be given to lessen the economic impact to breeders by letting them develop an exit strategy.
29 minutes ago from twidroid
copy/paste
|

12-10-2009, 04:43 PM
|
 |
Snakes need love too!
  
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,299
Points: 51,801, Level: 70 |
Level up: 47%, 749 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,870
Thanked 2,392 Times in 1,712 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
|

12-10-2009, 04:45 PM
|
 |
I'M HERE FOR TEH LULZ.
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Possum Kingdom
Posts: 4,343
Points: 10,737, Level: 31 |
Level up: 27%, 513 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,797
Thanked 1,698 Times in 992 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenny06
Senator Cardin agreed that time should be given to lessen the economic impact to breeders by letting them develop an exit strategy.
29 minutes ago from twidroid
copy/paste
|
And what about the pet owners who might need vetting out of state? What about the pet owners that need to move? Oh, I know! Lets all have a mass snake skinning fest!
These people are serious?
And they wonder why people have no faith in their government.
__________________
Kung Pao Constrictors
"
You mean The Onion is not a legitimate news outlet?"
Allergenic
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to RayRay For This Useful Post:
|
|

12-10-2009, 04:49 PM
|
 |
Has Jungle Carpet Fever
  
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germantown, Tn.
Posts: 2,120
Points: 10,200, Level: 30 |
Level up: 42%, 350 Points needed |
Thanks: 583
Thanked 423 Times in 294 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
There is no way this should pass senate. 10 people showed up??? I am not believing this! How did it even get heard today with just 10 showing up? Who were the 10 that showed up?
Last edited by Anypituophis; 12-10-2009 at 04:59 PM.
|

12-10-2009, 04:57 PM
|
 |
I'M HERE FOR TEH LULZ.
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Possum Kingdom
Posts: 4,343
Points: 10,737, Level: 31 |
Level up: 27%, 513 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,797
Thanked 1,698 Times in 992 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
Sorry for so many posts, but I cannot even concentrate at work because I'm trying to keep tabs on this.
I've been like this all week: e-mails, forwarding e-mails, phone calls, letters PLUS work, and repeat.
For what? For nothing? I have only two choice words for my government right now. I'm sure you can guess what they are and they are not forum appropriate.
__________________
Kung Pao Constrictors
"
You mean The Onion is not a legitimate news outlet?"
Allergenic
|

12-10-2009, 05:02 PM
|
|
RTB Aficionado

|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 775
Level up: 33%, 269 Points needed |
Thanks: 0
Thanked 116 Times in 85 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Python Ban Moves Forward Despite Questionable Science
i know this is a terrible thing to ask. hopefully it wont come to this but if this does get passed how long will it take to take effect, will we have at least a year or something like that?
__________________
ryan-
1.0 ball python-cuddles
1.1 burm hector and camila
0.0.1 tokay elmo
0.0.1 tarantula
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|