Which pix should be our August MOTM?

[Aaron_NSBM]

can everyone line the pixs up with the numbers better this time?

[DaveDragon]

Originally Posted by Aaron_NSBM

can everyone line the pixs up with the numbers better this time?

Looks great!!!

[angrybananapeel]

Originally Posted by DaveDragon

I can see them all for once!

What happened to the 400 x 400 rule?? Some of them look to be bigger

In my opinion, I think the pixel size rule needs to be upped.

1. I've only seen it enforced once out of the three times 'round which isn't fair to those of us who follow it.
2. hard to view a decent pic of a large boa or other animal over 1 foot long, hence giving advantage to the small lizard owner. (no offense - seriously, it was probably the best viewable pic in the thread - to last month's winner, but you have to admit, size of the subject was a clear advantage, making for a much more beautiful pic and more detailed as well.)
3. Anyone who still has dial-up seriously needs to upgrade, and not dictate what the rest of us should be able to enjoy. Darwinism.
4. photobucket is free and shouldn't harm the bandwidth of rtb for those who would like to use a higher pixel size to showcase the pic of their animal.
5. It doesn't seem to be a huge issue with this current vote since we seem to have mostly larger animals in the pictures for this month anyhow, so I figure I'd weigh in here and see how others feel.

anyhow, that's just my opinion on the matter. I've seen the threads ( and made a couple) with the bigger pics, and they've hardly harmed the site. I think it's worth the few extra seconds a page may take to load.

[DaveDragon]

Originally Posted by angrybananapeel

In my opinion, I think the pixel size rule needs to be upped.

1. I've only seen it enforced once out of the three times 'round which isn't fair to those of us who follow it.
2. hard to view a decent pic of a large boa or other animal over 1 foot long, hence giving advantage to the small lizard owner. (no offense - seriously, it was probably the best viewable pic in the thread - to last month's winner, but you have to admit, size of the subject was a clear advantage, making for a much more beautiful pic and more detailed as well.)
3. Anyone who still has dial-up seriously needs to upgrade, and not dictate what the rest of us should be able to enjoy. Darwinism.
4. photobucket is free and shouldn't harm the bandwidth of rtb for those who would like to use a higher pixel size to showcase the pic of their animal.
5. It doesn't seem to be a huge issue with this current vote since we seem to have mostly larger animals in the pictures for this month anyhow, so I figure I'd weigh in here and see how others feel.

anyhow, that's just my opinion on the matter. I've seen the threads ( and made a couple) with the bigger pics, and they've hardly harmed the site. I think it's worth the few extra seconds a page may take to load.

I agree on all points. On point number 2 - I did crop it to maximize the area. The same with this months pic. You really can't appreciate the full beauty of a snake with such a small pic.

I vote for standard Photobucket size of 800 x 600.

[ssjsmits]

I don't even know why I bother anymore, ha.

[angrybananapeel]

Originally Posted by Adrya

Pic #2 is just outstanding... gorgeous boa.


.....

Originally Posted by Adrya

#2!!!!!!!! #222222!!!!!!!!!!!! TWOOOOOx00rZZ!!!!1!!11!1!1ONE

shameless, but messing up on the shift !!!! key may have done ya in!1!11!!!

[Adrya]

lol... I did that on purpose...