» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Quick Moderation |
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Ads |
|
|
 |

08-13-2008, 07:34 AM
|
 |
Lehrer und Forscher
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Königsreich Thailand
Posts: 280
Level up: 53%, 190 Points needed |
Thanks: 8
Thanked 247 Times in 137 Posts
|
|
|
Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
The Bush administration yesterday issued a draft proposal that would eviscerate the Endangered Species Act. It would allow the Secretary of the Interior (for land areas) and the Secretary of Commerce (for marine areas) to simply bypass the laws protecting endangered species and their habitats by allowing them to make a determination on their own as to whether the actions of the administration are harmful to endangered species and their habitats.
.
Here is a link to a story on this:
Bush Administration Proposes Draft Regulations Gutting Protections for Nation's Endangered Species
.
Although the story does not make reference to this, in the draft, it states that consultations are not needed by any federal agencies before they act. In other words, the Secretaries of the Interior and Commerce do not need to consult with the experts that they had to consult with in the past before making decisions; they can simply can make their own uninformed decisions (which would be based on the desires of the masters that bankrolled their administration's election campaign, of course).
.
Here is a recent release that came up while I was writing this:
Bush Administration takes aim at Endangered Species Act - Defenders of Wildlife
.
This states what I had mentioned above:
Quote:
Washington, D.C. – Yesterday’s announcement by the Bush Administration regarding changes to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was a last-ditch effort by a near-extinct administration to impose the same fate on America’s endangered species.
The so-called “narrow revisions” are just wide enough to ensure that agencies can go ahead with projects without being subject to checks and balances, or consultation. This calculated and political decision leaves America’s most threatened species at the mercy of a wholly inadequate review process, with no requirement for a scientific understanding of the impact on affected species. In fact, many of the agencies now required to determine the impact of an action on a species do not even have biologists on staff.
|
.
Yet another story on the topic:
Endangered Species Act: Who needs laws?
with a paragraph that comes straight to the point:
Quote:
The logic behind the would-be rules works this way: Say the Department of Transportation wants to fund a highway. That agency would decide - without the help of scientists, say, at the National Marine Fisheries Service - that the project meets ESA standards....
.
The real reason for this maneuver is that the Bush administration is an endangered species, of sorts. This is an attempt to change a federal law by regulation, knowing that the clock is ticking quickly. Or too slowly, depending on your perspective.
|
.
Here is the draft: http://www.nwf.org/nwfwebadmin/binar...SAChanges1.pdf
Please read it very carefully. It is skillfully written so you may not actually see what they are trying to do.
.
One day after the draft was issued, it has already started in the hope that Bush administration can override the law:
.
1,600,000 acres of protected habitat in the Pacific northwest was earmarked to be slashed. Here is the link to the story:
Feds Slash Protections for Owl Habitat : Earthjustice: Environmental Law
.
The ESA (Endangered Species Act) has brought many species back from the brink of extinction. Some great examples of herps that it has rescued from probable extinction in the US are the American Alligator ( Alligator mississippiensis) and the American Crocodile ( Crocodylus actus), the latter of which has just recently recovered to the point that it was taken off of the ESA protected list. These habitats that protect the endangered species also are habitat for many sympatric species- including herps.
.
I guess after they finished taking away so many of the people's freedoms over there, they think it is time to work on the animals and nature.
.
Michael
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mrcota For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-14-2008, 04:40 AM
|
 |
Your Sick Uncle Morti.
   
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 10,967
Points: 77,829, Level: 86 |
Level up: 72%, 521 Points needed |
Thanks: 3,034
Thanked 5,789 Times in 2,613 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
Wow... That is terrible and i hope that it doesn't go through. I am highly in favor of protecting endangered species.
__________________
|

08-14-2008, 04:51 AM
|
 |
Regular RTB User

|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 427
Level up: 77%, 115 Points needed |
Thanks: 4
Thanked 168 Times in 112 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
__________________
The great and strong man is one who bears within his character many contradictions.
Crocodilian care.
|

08-14-2008, 05:02 AM
|
 |
Go google yourself!
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mid-County Area, Texas
Posts: 5,481
Points: 13,970, Level: 35 |
Level up: 89%, 80 Points needed |
Thanks: 3,131
Thanked 1,298 Times in 935 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
The site that I work at, which is the largest refinery in the US, has strict rules about wildlife. We are currently expanding a crude unit, which will continue for the next 4 years. My point to this post, is that if a bird builds a nest and lays eggs at ANY place in the expansion, work in that area shuts down until the eggs hatch and the birds leave the nest. If the bird happens to lay eggs in a nest built on a piece of equipment, that equipment is out of service until the baby birds leave the nest. We also have lots of gators out there on the site. We consider ourselves to be on their territory, so if they do not get out of harms way on their own, the wildlife people relocate them back across the street to the canal that they came from. We have a zero tolerance policy for messing with any kind of wildlife, And I have said my piece about snakes, to which I was told that they have not had a problem with them. They assured me that venomous or not, the snakes would be treated with the same respect any other wildlife would be treated with. I am thankful, that no matter what the laws say, I can still be proud to work where I do, and that the people in management at that site have a respect for wildlife.
.
So if it is like that at Motiva, why can't it be like that everywhere else? What gives us (humans) the right to disreguard all other life forms? Its truely sickening.
.
Sorry if my post didn't make sense...I know I am rambling, this is just very upsetting.
|

08-14-2008, 05:08 AM
|
 |
Resident Stoner

|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rochester WA
Posts: 2,541
Level up: 98%, 11 Points needed |
Thanks: 668
Thanked 628 Times in 506 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
u work for the oil man kobi?!?!?!? i hate u!!! hehehe just kidding
but can u talk them into sharin some of that new found wealth with the rest of us...i could sure use it...
edit: i dunno what i was sayin when i said "new wealth" i guess the oil co. arent new to wealth...but either way...they should share!!
__________________
0.1 Hypo BCI - Inga
1.0 Pastel BCI - Edrick
1.0 Albino BCI - Apollo
1.0 Amel Corn Snake - Kirby
1.0 Pitbull/mix - Maynard
Last edited by Stigma; 08-14-2008 at 05:14 AM.
|

08-14-2008, 05:14 AM
|
 |
Go google yourself!
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mid-County Area, Texas
Posts: 5,481
Points: 13,970, Level: 35 |
Level up: 89%, 80 Points needed |
Thanks: 3,131
Thanked 1,298 Times in 935 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
HA! I pay the same thing you do for gas. We don't determine price...unfortunately.
|

08-14-2008, 06:52 AM
|
 |
Sammy's Loveable keeper
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SomePlace in the NW
Posts: 14,537
Points: 32,835, Level: 55 |
Level up: 81%, 215 Points needed |
Thanks: 4,459
Thanked 2,889 Times in 2,416 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
I will read the above links some time tomorrow when I'm not too tired to read.
The ESA act has shut the doors of many logging companies out here in the Pacific northwest.
As in my line of work when timber companies shut down so does the work.
I only hope they can get there act together, and put an end to it all.
They want to complain that the Coho Salmon are not coming back in the numbers they want but they won't do any thing about the seals and sea lions that eat them.
Just let nature take its coarse with out interfering with it.
Just my two cents
__________________
If all else fails, read the directions.
0.1.0 BCI Sammy, 1.1.0 Royal Python Bonnie & Clyde, 0.0.1 Corn Snake Anakin, 0.1.0 JCP Leia
Fallen Pets
leo's(RIP Scooter, Skipper RIP),Rat (RIP Lucy RIP), Boa (RIP Phoenix)
America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She well knows that by enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standards of freedom. – John Quincy Adams (1821)
|

08-14-2008, 07:53 AM
|
 |
I Really Need a Life !
  
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern West Virginia
Posts: 8,203
Points: 20,762, Level: 44 |
Level up: 2%, 888 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,319
Thanked 1,323 Times in 902 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
WHAT THE HECK!!!
Ditto, Morti.. Ditto..
|

08-14-2008, 08:00 AM
|
 |
Jumps overboard

|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,560
Points: 11,007, Level: 31 |
Level up: 66%, 243 Points needed |
Thanks: 731
Thanked 1,038 Times in 707 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
Thing is, this isn't something that can just be easily fixed...once a species is gone it is gone. We can't do something carelessly and then say in 20 years, "oops, my bad". We can't pull new animals out of our butts.
ON A SIDE NOTE: Adrya, that is the best avatar picture of you yet!!!!
|

08-14-2008, 08:16 AM
|
 |
I Really Need a Life !
  
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern West Virginia
Posts: 8,203
Points: 20,762, Level: 44 |
Level up: 2%, 888 Points needed |
Thanks: 1,319
Thanked 1,323 Times in 902 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
Quote:
Originally Posted by HARTSOCK
Thing is, this isn't something that can just be easily fixed...once a species is gone it is gone. We can't do something carelessly and then say in 20 years, "oops, my bad". We can't pull new animals out of our butts.
ON A SIDE NOTE: Adrya, that is the best avatar picture of you yet!!!!
|
I completely agree. It's so infuriating to even think about what the heck they're trying to do. How can they just put aside the importance of saving endangered wildlife, or even wildlife in general? There are so many key species that depend on other species to survive, many of which are endangered. All life on this earth today is the last 1% of all life that has ever existed, we can't just let more species die out because of these careless administrations.
[thanks, Scott!]
|

08-14-2008, 02:02 PM
|
|
Newbie to RedTailBoa.net
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 44
Level up: 64%, 147 Points needed |
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
Agreed. If anything the ESA needs to be tightened. There should be none of these 'buy-out' tactics where these megacorporations are allowed to bulldoze endangered species for a small fine (ie - Gopher Tortoises). And heck, if our government is determined to police the world, why not actually do something good and control the overfishing and pollution of all the South-East Asian nations (including Japan) that are decimating the population of so much wildlife.
Once they're gone, they're gone for good.
|

08-14-2008, 03:47 PM
|
 |
the Cosmic Serpent
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashland Oregon
Posts: 2,378
Level up: 69%, 155 Points needed |
Thanks: 454
Thanked 693 Times in 668 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
Who gave them the right to do that? I've been hearing a lot about this lately and it just boils my blood. Goes to show you money and profit come before science and conservation. I can't wait till that scum is out of the white house...it's been way too long.
__________________
|

08-14-2008, 07:51 PM
|
 |
Regular RTB User

|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 427
Level up: 77%, 115 Points needed |
Thanks: 4
Thanked 168 Times in 112 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icicle
I will read the above links some time tomorrow when I'm not too tired to read.
The ESA act has shut the doors of many logging companies out here in the Pacific northwest.
As in my line of work when timber companies shut down so does the work.
I only hope they can get there act together, and put an end to it all.
They want to complain that the Coho Salmon are not coming back in the numbers they want but they won't do any thing about the seals and sea lions that eat them.
Just let nature take its coarse with out interfering with it.
Just my two cents
|
So, are you for or against?
Since your job is on the line, I'd say against, but since you say you think nature should hold it's own, I think you're for. But I'm not sure.
Either way, people do not hold their own as part of nature. We are Us and nature is wild life. That's how man has percieved it as such for at least as I have been alive.
So in that line, telling ourselves we need to have the ESA intact is contributing the fact that we can actually seperate ourselves, while not telling seals to leave the fish alone because they are part of nature; letting it run it's course.
Now in the books, we are a part of nature. The problem with that, is that it's in our nature to have everything. No one is ever truely happy. We want this and then that and then want that back again but keep this as well. Without control, we'd screw ourselves over so bad because at the end of the day, money is the only thing that matters. Even if it means we wipe out all of the west coast trees and off countless numbers of species.
No matter how you look at it though, we are letting nature go on it's way. It's in our nature to control and own everything, so with regulations at play it's our nature to play those. To take, that is also our nature.
Ditching the ESA would be rediculous.
__________________
The great and strong man is one who bears within his character many contradictions.
Crocodilian care.
|

08-14-2008, 07:55 PM
|
 |
Happy Fun Ball/Admin
  
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 5,960
Points: 20,584, Level: 43 |
Level up: 82%, 166 Points needed |
Thanks: 257
Thanked 583 Times in 357 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
Lets stay on topic here, who you are or are not going to vote for hardly has any relevance to this thread.
Politics is one of the things restricted in the TOS, lets make this less about who and more about how to stop it or help it, which ever side your on.
__________________
Real knowledge is to know the extent of ones ignorance. (Confucius)
The inner machinations of my mind are an enigma. (Patrick)
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to toker For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-14-2008, 08:07 PM
|
 |
Happy Fun Ball/Admin
  
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 5,960
Points: 20,584, Level: 43 |
Level up: 82%, 166 Points needed |
Thanks: 257
Thanked 583 Times in 357 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
As for my take on it, I think there should be some type of protection for Protected critters. The problem is enforcement. You will always have people doing what they want, no matter who says its bad.
Personally I don't think there is any government program immune from review or redesign.
__________________
Real knowledge is to know the extent of ones ignorance. (Confucius)
The inner machinations of my mind are an enigma. (Patrick)
|

08-14-2008, 08:13 PM
|
 |
Sammy's Loveable keeper
 
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SomePlace in the NW
Posts: 14,537
Points: 32,835, Level: 55 |
Level up: 81%, 215 Points needed |
Thanks: 4,459
Thanked 2,889 Times in 2,416 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Bush Administration to eviscerate ESA
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrokadilyanGuy3
So, are you for or against?
Since your job is on the line, I'd say against, but since you say you think nature should hold it's own, I think you're for. But I'm not sure.
Ditching the ESA would be rediculous.
|
To me I kinda have mixed feelings about the ESA.
In one hand I think they have too much red tape to cut though,
But on the other hand they did limit on where to cut timber to save the Birds.
I also believe there should be speical rules in place to keep one speices alive.
It is like you either have to many predators and not enough prey, or you have too much prey and not enough predators. If they could work out in numbers or any other way to make a balanced system I would be happy.
However there is a fine line and even a finer line when it come to point of wiping out an entire speices.
__________________
If all else fails, read the directions.
0.1.0 BCI Sammy, 1.1.0 Royal Python Bonnie & Clyde, 0.0.1 Corn Snake Anakin, 0.1.0 JCP Leia
Fallen Pets
leo's(RIP Scooter, Skipper RIP),Rat (RIP Lucy RIP), Boa (RIP Phoenix)
America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She well knows that by enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standards of freedom. – John Quincy Adams (1821)
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|