» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Ads |
|
|
 |
 |

02-21-2006, 12:24 PM
|
 |
Where's the bag of trix?
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,837
Thanks: 222
Thanked 117 Times in 92 Posts
Points: 19,536.93
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 19,536.93
Donate
Rep Power: 578
|
|
|
Dead whales in Mexico
By James C. McKinley Jr. The New York Times

SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2006
MEXICO CITY The Mexican authorities are investigating the mysterious deaths of eight whales found washed ashore along the Sea of Cortez last month, an unusually large number that suggests some common cause.
The whales come from several plankton-eating species and apparently died at sea in November and December, biologists said. But they do not show any signs of having been caught in long-line fishing nets, which sometimes suffocate the mammoth animals. Nor have biologists found any signs of a toxic spill or outbreak of disease that would account for their deaths.
"Right now, it's a mystery," said Luis Fueyo, an assistant federal prosecutor for environmental crimes, who is overseeing the investigation. "We have a puzzle."
The first sign something was wrong came on Jan. 4, when the remains of two humpback whales were spotted on the shore near the town of El Dorado in Culiacán state.
Scientists determined they had died in early November. Since then, six more giant bodies have turned up, among them a third humpback, a minke whale, a fin whale and a baby gray whale. Three bodies were discovered on Jan. 18 during an aerial search of the Sinaloa coast.
The discovery of the carcasses set in motion a frantic search for forensic evidence. Biologists tracked currents to determine if all the whales might have been in the same place when they died, even though they ended up scattered over a 800-kilometer, or 500-mile, coastline.
The investigators also looked for signs of disease or poisons, both natural and synthetic. It was slow going. All of the bodies were badly decomposed. Only the baby gray whale provided enough tissue to test for diseases or poisons.
On Friday, environmental officials announced that those tests had found no evidence of a toxic algae bloom, other poisons or infections.
Nor have the investigations turned up signs of mistreatment by fishermen.
The deaths occurred just as about 2,000 gray whales from the Pacific began arriving in the Sea of Cortez, where they spend every winter as part of a centuries-old migration pattern. Mexican officials say they usually find about 10 dead whales a year; nine in the space of two weeks have set off alarm bells.
Environmentalists say the Sea of Cortez, one of the world's richest fisheries and most diverse marine habitats, is poorly policed and substantially overfished, because the Mexican government has granted more and more permits for trawlers to use long-line nets.
The deaths of so many whales has prompted urgent calls from some environmental groups for quick action to find the cause.
Besides the whales, two dolphins and an olive ridley sea turtle have also washed up dead in the same region.
"I'm worried," said Homero Aridjis, a poet and naturalist who heads the Group of One Hundred, an environmental organization. "We are just starting the year and already we seem to see a dead whale every day. Something is happening there and it needs to be investigated."
Fueyo, however, said none of the bodies showed signs of wounds from nets on their fins, nor signs of other trauma that might have been caused by fishing boats.
Biologists also did not find the usual telltale massacres of fish and sea birds that would accompany a toxic bloom of algae or another release of poisonous materials.
"What's happening is totally irregular," Fueyo said.

|

02-21-2006, 12:26 PM
|
 |
Where's the bag of trix?
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,837
Thanks: 222
Thanked 117 Times in 92 Posts
Points: 19,536.93
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 19,536.93
Donate
Rep Power: 578
|
|
UNDIAGNOSED DEATHS, WHALES - MEXICO (SINALOA)
> *********************************************
> A ProMED-mail post
>
> ProMED-mail is a program of the
> International Society for Infectious Diseases
>
>
> Date: 19 Feb 2006
> From: Alfonso Rodriguez
> Source: International Herald Tribune, 19 Feb 2006 [edited]
>
>
>
> 8 dead whales are proving a mystery in Mexico
> ---------------------------------------------
> Mexican authorities are investigating the mysterious deaths of 8
> whales found washed ashore along the Sea of Cortez last month
> [January 2006], an unusually large number that suggests some common
> cause.
>
> The whales come from several plankton-eating species and apparently
> died at sea in November and December [2005], biologists said. But
> they do not show any signs of having been caught in long-line fishing
> nets, which sometimes suffocate the mammoth animals, nor have
> biologists found any signs of a toxic spill or outbreak of disease
> that would account for their deaths.
>
> "Right now, it's a mystery," said Luis Fueyo, an assistant federal
> prosecutor for environmental crimes, who is overseeing the
> investigation.
>
> The 1st sign something was wrong came on 4 Jan 2006, when the remains
> of 2 humpback whales were spotted on the shore near the town of El
> Dorado in Culiacan state.
>
> Scientists determined they had died in early November 2005. Since
> then, 6 more giant bodies have turned up, among them a 3rd humpback,
> a minke whale, a fin whale and a baby gray whale. 3 bodies were
> discovered on 18 Jan 2006 during an aerial search of the Sinaloa
> coast.
>
> The discovery of the carcasses set in motion a frantic search for
> forensic evidence. Biologists tracked currents to determine whether
> all the whales might have been in the same place when they died, even
> though they ended up scattered over a 500-mile coastline.
>
> The investigators also looked for signs of disease or poisons, both
> natural and synthetic. It was slow going. All of the bodies were
> badly decomposed. Only the baby gray whale provided enough tissue to
> test for diseases or poisons.
>
> On Friday [17 Feb 2006], environmental officials announced that those
> tests had found no evidence of a toxic algae bloom, other poisons or
> infections, nor have the investigations turned up signs of
> mistreatment by fishermen.
>
> The deaths occurred just as about 2000 gray whales from the Pacific
> began arriving in the Sea of Cortez, where they spend every winter as
> part of a centuries-old migration. Mexican officials say they usually
> find about 10 dead whales a year; 9 in the space of 2 weeks have set
> off alarm bells.
>
> Environmentalists say the Sea of Cortez, one of the world's richest
> fisheries and most diverse marine habitats, is poorly policed and
> substantially over-fished, because the Mexican government has granted
> more and more permits for trawlers to use long-line nets.
>
> The deaths of so many whales has prompted urgent calls from some
> environmental groups for quick action to find the cause.
>
> Besides the whales, 2 dolphins and an Olive Ridley sea turtle have
> also washed up dead in the same region.
>
> "I'm worried," said Homero Aridjis, a poet and naturalist who heads
> the Group of One Hundred, an environmental organization. "We are just
> starting the year, and already we seem to see a dead whale every day.
> Something is happening there, and it needs to be investigated."
>
> Fueyo, however, said none of the bodies showed signs of wounds from
> nets on their fins, nor signs of other trauma that might have been
> caused by fishing boats.
>
> Biologists also did not find the usual telltale massacres of fish and
> sea birds that would accompany a toxic bloom of algae or another
> release of poisonous materials.
>
> [Byline: James C. McKinley Jr.]
>
> --
> ProMED-mail
>
>
> [The deaths of so many whales of different species along with
> dolphins and a
> turtle indicate that there may be a toxin in the water over a
> large area. [In
> spite of what the environmentalists said] perhaps these animals
> came through a
> red tide bloom in the course of their migration.
>
> For a map of Sinaloa see:
> .
>
> For photos of the whale species see:
> Fin whale
> Gray whale
>
> Humpback whale
> Minke whale
> - Mod.TG]
>
> [This could just be an apparent cluster, with no significance,
> given that the
> whales died over a 2-month period and ended up widely scattered along 500
> miles of coast. - Mod.JW]
>
> [see also:
> 2003
> ----
> Toxic algae, whales - USA (MA) 20030813.2013
> Toxic algae, whales - USA (Maine) 20030804.1911
> 2000
> ----
> Undiagnosed deaths, pigmy whales - USA (Florida) (03) 20000411.0515
> Undiagnosed deaths, pigmy whales - USA (Florida) (02) 20000321.0393
> Undiagnosed deaths, pigmy whales - USA (Florida) 20000319.0385
> 1998
> ----
> Sperm whales beached, explanation - UK 19980512.0934]
|

02-22-2006, 08:31 PM
|
 |
Regular RTB User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Points: 2,741.01
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 2,741.01
Donate
Rep Power: 27
|
|
|
With the other news topic in regards to so many turtles dieing due to the red tide it is entirely possible that many of these whales and other animals may have caught the edge of a red tide bloom in their migration. With how long the different blooms seem to be lasting there's no telling how long, or how far out, the blooms are.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
Points Per Thread View: 0.25
Points Per Thread: 1.00
Points Per Reply: 0.50
|
|
|
|