Quote:
Originally Posted by BoaFanatic17
ok for the third time now i waill say thi since you obviously cant comprehend what you read. with a burm you can have it for a while and it never show signs of aggression. so you start to get a little trust, and all of the sudden one day bam you get hit. so you dont know what to expect with them. where retics you do know what to expect. they are aggressive snakes 99% of the time. so even if they do ack nice and calm for a month straight you always that they are gonna turn to their aggressive side sooner or later. that clear enough this time or am i gonna have to repeat this over and over again? and i have had several snakes for over six years. thanks again for thinking you know anything about me.
|
I don't have reading comprehension problems, but I am having trouble figuring out your posts. In another post you claim to have over 12 years experience...now in the post above you claim over 6...?????
You've had many hots (according to your posts) and got rid of them because of a close call. You got rid of some burms because YOU weren't able to adjust to THEIR behavior. All of this in 6 or 12 years....Now you think a retic is your next snake. If you get the retic it will end poorly at best. Please don't get the retic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spix14
I gotta agree with Raze here. You always have to expect or at least be ready for aggression from any reptile. You say you would rather have a retic than a burm because a burm would lull you into a false sense of safety...when in reality, you shouldn't HAVE that sense of safety, with any reptile. So I fail to see what difference it makes.
|
I suggest you read and comprehend what spix wrote. If you can't expect the unexpected from a dangerous reptile....you have no buisness trying to keep one.
