|
Potential problems with any permit system, IMHO, include how to define what needs a permit and what steps are taken to enforce the system.
The title of this thread includes the term "large" constrictors. That, to me, is a sliding scale. To me, Burms, Retics, African Rocks, Anacondas, etc. are large constrictors. But I guarantee you that my mother thinks my 6' RTB is HUGE! Some of the truly uninitiated may see a 4' BP as a large constrictor. Do you then use a definition of "dangerous?" What, then, is dangerous? Personally, I do not consider the boids to be "dangerous" when handled correctly, yet I would consider venomous snakes to be dangerous for me with my lack of experience and knowledge. Someone skilled in handling hots probably does not consider them "dangerous." It is all relative, yet it will have to be defined in black and white by some legislative body.
The second issue involves enforcement. I have 4 snakes and a tortoise in my house and I would bet that nobody knows it if they do not know me. How do you force me to adhere to the rules requiring that I obtain permits? With internet sales and unregulated reptile shows, it is virtually impossible to prevent someone from obtaining almost anything they want without permits. So sanctions or penalties could only be assessed when someone is found to be in possession of non-permitted animals. Do we require that veterinarians only treat permitted animals? Is there mandatory reporting? Wouldn't that lead to reptiles not getting treatment when needed or are we assuming that all responsible herpers would get the necessary permits? What penalties are assessed? Fines? Seizures? And as outlined earlier, what happens to the money? What happens to the seized collections?
One of the problems with being a lawyer by training is that the questions just keep coming. Personally, I see a lot of problems with a permit system. If the alternative is outright banishment, however.............
|
