Thanks Shane!
My own thoughts on permits are something if I HAVE to get one to keep the animals I want, I will do so, and I will abide by the laws.
I have a real problem forking out money to the government, though when it is not going back into helping the animals somehow; or keeping the animals from abuse/neglect/improper care.
Most of the permit systems that are being introduced as legislation do NOT require anything more than an application and a fee. No specific training, or education, or investigation of the housing are required, like those for venomous permits.
Many people say "its just like for dogs and cats, you have to get them licensed".
Yes, and we see how well THAT has worked to protect the animals from improper care, and housing.
How many people still keep dogs/cats that are NOT licensed? You don't hear of people panicking because a Lhasa Apso was found without proper licensing on the news. You WILL however hear about the illegally kept large snake that is capable of killing kids, animals, etc..
Also, shelters, rescues, federal funding and officials exist to help dogs and cats (ferrets, etc) and provide them with new homes, or assistance.
Such accomodations are not provided for reptiles, and many places are not capable of housing an adult large constrictor, much less feeding it.
So what happens to the illegally kept animals when they are seized?? There aren't enough shelters for reptiles, and the animal shelters usually can't handle the animals.
I think it would be a good system IF the money were placed BACK into caring for animals that were illegally/improperly kept and education as well as providing officers to investigate and follow up on the animals. Of course, that would drive the permit price WAY up.
It appears the permits are currently just another way for the government to make money, in my opinion, and of course, up for debate
