<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font class="pn-sub">Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT class="pn-sub"><BLOCKQUOTE> and tossed it to a hungry burm, and the burm did what it does.... what would yall say?? What do you think the "general public" would think??
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd say you were intellectually and ethically inept. As far as the general public goes? You would be reaffirming the already existent stereotypes that are all to prevelant amisdt the populace. That reptile keepers are sadistic people who don't care about animals, they only care about their own entertainment at the expense of other animals lives.
<TABLE BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER WIDTH=85%><TR><TD><font class="pn-sub">Quote:</font><HR></TD></TR><TR><TD><FONT class="pn-sub"><BLOCKQUOTE>The truth of the mater is that humans take it upon themselves to determine what animal should have what rights. I really think that all animals should have the same rights...
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><HR></TD></TR></TABLE>
Cats make up the diets of canines on occasion. Do you think Purina[TM} is likely to come out with a new brand? CAt chow for dogs? How about a aborted fetuses being givin' to Panthera tigris at zoological gardens. Or how about children killed in car wrecks? Foregoing the lamb, chicken and beef that makes up the bulk of the animal by-products that are found in dog-food? I'm answering your questions. Have anymore? So yes, we do determine what animals are "acceptable" for consumption. Those animals are domesticated livestock who have been selectively bred for the purpose of either feeding humans or companion animals. Just like rats, mice, rabbits, mealworms, crickets, fruit-flies,etc. Have been selectively bred for consumption purposes. MAle felines have been known to commit infanticide when a congener's neonatal progeny have been introduced to their environment. Should we begin feeding live neonatal kits to male domestic felines?
[addsig]
